Wednesday, August 27, 2008

A basic, must-have, tool for the church soundman

Number One on my list:
a decibel meter, manufactured for, and sold by, of all places, Radio Shack.

I actually have the "old school" version with an actual VU meter instead of this nifty LCD display model. The principle is still the same, however, acceptable sound pressure levels, (SPL's) can physically be measured. While things like tolerance, enjoyment and annoyance are very subjective and at best a moving target, and actual physical output level is not. Even if you are not trained or even acquainted with the various technical terms or scientific equations, you can still take a reading. At it's simplest form, if the number on the display is "100" and this "feels" too loud for your room or your situation, then it probably is.

Sound nerds will talk about the value of "A" weighting vs "C" weighting, a selectable option on the meter. To a certain extent, it's simply a matter of preference, but to explain it simply:
"A" weighting selected on the meter measures the SPL's of primarily middle and upper frequencies, or, the ones that hurt the most. "C" weighting measures a wider range of frequencies, extending down to the low end frequencies, as low as 90-100 hz, or typically bass notes. A measurement of 104 db C weighted will likely correspond to about 92 or 93 on A weighted. (You can check that out and correct me if you'd like).

The bottom line is this- rather than beating your head against the wall from week to week, it is possible to arrive at an average SPL level that is agreed upon by the interested parties, or at least the parties with the most influence. Our senior pastor at our church has "signed off" on approximately 92 db A weighted, or an average of 102, 103 db C weighted. Our church, as a part of our history and culture, plays a mix of contemporary praise songs, Black Gospel, traditional hymns, and original songs. The approximate length of our church from the back wall of the choir loft to the back pew where I stand (aka Front of the House) is about 96 feet.

My concept when setting the overall level of volume for Sunday worship services has changed over the years, and may be the subject of further articles. But for now, let me say this: my personal goal is to convey the energy and excitement coming from the stage, all the way to the back of the room. High energy music should be played with high level SPL's. This engages the entire audience. People who stand in the last four rows of pews, who have limited vision when the entire congregation is standing anyway, should not be asking themselves, "what's going on?", or be able to carry on a separate conversation while Worship is supposed to be happening. Now, some people might interpret this to mean that I am trying to beat the congregation into submission by overwhelming them with volume- and I must admit, I grin a little at that idea. But it's not the point at all.

The point for me is, the worship team and the musicians are (hopefully) playing their hearts out, and doing so for EVERYONE. That includes the people that come in late, the large groups of visitors all forced to sit together, the people who just have no place left to sit and end up on folding chairs in the narthex.

Over the years I have fielded both criticism and praise for my mix, including, I suppose the volume levels. Suprisingly, no one has ever said to me by way of praise, "Wow, great SPL level today", but rather, "Great mix", or "Nice work". Conversely, the critics have only one thing to say: "Too Loud". I always ask them to specify WHICH specific thing was to loud... the bass? The drums? The organ? The "Too Loud" comment is never directed at any one thing, it only has to do with "overall" volume. But seriously, the critics are outnumbered 10 to 1. This is not because I'm the greatest engineer in the world, but rather because I think we have finally found consistency in our sound. Control of the stage level, and therefore control of the overall room, is how we obtain this consistency. And this leads to me to the next indispensable tool in our tech arsenal: The Aviom system. In our next episode.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Outline for Urban Worship Symposium Tech Clinic

Tech Clinic Outline

How do we achieve consistency and excellence in our worship?

1) Worship Committee
2) Talent pool
3) constant and stable tech enviroment

What does a "constant and stable tech environment" bring to the worship?

1) A stress-free environment for the talent pool
a. things happen when they are supposed to happen
b. nothing bad happens
2) creative freedom and spontaneity
a. spontaneity should not be defined as "changing microphones because one didn't work"
b. creative freedom is born out of comfort and confidence
c. musical performance is affected and changes with the environment
d. pastor can wake up on Sunday and add a slideshow to the sermon

What are the tools that we use on a regular basis to create this "stable tech environment"?

1) Radio Shack db meter
-discussion of SPL levels, the threshold of pain, and the threshold of annoyance
-most churches could afford this tool
- live demo

2) Yamaha M7CL
- why we chose to go digital
- the pros and cons
- live demo

3) Splitter system and stage boxes

4) Aviom system
- why we chose to go "in-ears"
- the pros and cons
- why we chose to clear out the amplifiers
- how this affects the sound in the sanctuary and how it affects the Yamaha

5) The V-drums, and why we chose them

6) Projectors, screens and switchers- and all things Text

Saturday, August 9, 2008

A rock and roll legend lives on at New City Fellowship

At the beginning of this year we installed a Helpinstill Piano pickup.

The Helpinstill history goes back to the 1970s with piano rockers turned living legends Billy Joel, Elton John when a loud, present piano sound was needed in the PA. The problem with miking piano's has always been that the ambient sound of the band was far louder than the natural sound of the piano, making it difficult to place microphones in such a way that the necessary isolation was obtained. So Charles Helpinstill had a different idea: what if you didn't use a microphone at all. The piano pickup was born.

You can see a picture of the pickup in our 5' grand at New City Fellowship at the bottom of this page. It takes a little time to get the balance of the three bars correct, and, we've experienced some noise issues when a keyboard is on top of the piano, BUT it is by far the best piano sound that we've had, replacing the British "C-tape" as my piano amplification method of choice.

Monday, August 4, 2008

Other Tech blogs

In the spirit of collaboration and shameless self-promotion, I offer the following link-baits. My newly-created quasi-tech blog is not a new idea. There are other church and worship oriented websites offering information and resources. Faith Tools.Net is the companion site to the Faithtools podcast, which is one of the first related podcasts that I found on I-tunes when researching for this blog.

Church Tech Arts is a very well done blog with lots of links to other church tech websites. Probably the model for my little blog.

Going to 11 has a great tag line: "Making Church Sound "1" Louder". The Spinal Tap reference is undeniable and a hat's off to all Pro Sound/Church/Church Sound guys. To attempt to further explain the ironic twist of this: the relative "loudness" of any given church service would be the high on the list of day-to-day aggravations and concerns of any Sound Deacon, and, I'd be willing to venture, the downfall of more than one.

Anyway, I've enjoyed reading these blogs and will post the links in the sidebar. Hopefully some day I'll earn the return favor.